vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.9× T1 Energy Inc.). Krispy Kreme, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.1% vs -62.0%, a 54.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $27.9M).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
DNUT vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
