vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.3× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). Krispy Kreme, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.1% vs -9.3%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. TIC Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.1M vs $27.9M).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
DNUT vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
