vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.6× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -7.1%, a 20.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -2.9%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
DNUT vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
