vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.3M vs $30.1M, roughly 1.7× Dominari Holdings Inc.). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs -438.1%, a 516.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs -8.3%).
Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.
DOMH vs NRP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $51.3M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $40.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | 83.7% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | 78.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | -21.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | -28.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $54.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $65.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | 84.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | 92.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | 91.0% |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | 84.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | 85.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $30.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $138.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $772.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $30.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $142.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $188.8M |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $772.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $772.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $772.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $789.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | $772.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $34.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $71.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | 1.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
NRP
| Coal Royalty Revenues | $35.5M | 69% |
| Soda Ash Segment | $4.6M | 9% |
| Transportation And Processing Services | $4.4M | 9% |
| Production Lease Minimum Revenues | $2.7M | 5% |
| Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues | $2.4M | 5% |
| Other | $1.6M | 3% |
