vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dominari Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.1M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.9× DNA X, Inc.). DNA X, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -29.3% vs -438.1%, a 408.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs 9.9%).
DOMH vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | $42.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
SONM
Segment breakdown not available.
