vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and TEJON RANCH CO (TRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dominari Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.1M vs $21.1M, roughly 1.4× TEJON RANCH CO). TEJON RANCH CO runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -438.1%, a 445.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs 17.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs 68.8%).
Tejon Ranch Company, based in Lebec, California, is one of the largest private landowners in California. The company was incorporated in 1936 to organize the ownership of a large tract of land that was consolidated from four Mexican land grants acquired in the 1850s and 1860s by ranch founder Edward Fitzgerald Beale.
DOMH vs TRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $21.1M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | -64.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $957.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $-914.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | -50.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | -62.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | -53.8% |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | -12.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $9.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $475.2M |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $630.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | $475.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $473.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $471.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $472.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | $473.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $468.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $469.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | $467.4M |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | $630.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $629.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $618.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $614.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $608.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $598.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $590.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | $581.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $6.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | $-381.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $777.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-42.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -122.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -240.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -230.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -239.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -155.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -277.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -99.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 102.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 236.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 213.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 319.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 174.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 245.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 109.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | -1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
TRC
Segment breakdown not available.
