vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and Zeo Energy Corp. (ZEO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dominari Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.1M vs $18.6M, roughly 1.6× Zeo Energy Corp.). Zeo Energy Corp. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -438.1%, a 427.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs -0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs -4.0%).
DOMH vs ZEO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $18.6M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $-2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -11.8% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | -360.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $20.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-435.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-424.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $-277.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 99.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | -153.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | -72.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $6.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $79.1K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $5.3M |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $56.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $68.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $79.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $715.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $787.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $858.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $748.8K |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $-59.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $-39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $-53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | $-173.0M |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | $56.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $46.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $47.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $2.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $162.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -51.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
ZEO
| Nonrelated Party | $18.1M | 98% |
| Related Party | $432.1K | 2% |
