vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zevia PBC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.9M vs $30.1M, roughly 1.3× Dominari Holdings Inc.). Zevia PBC runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -438.1%, a 434.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dominari Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (220.4% vs -4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Zevia is a Los Angeles based company that produces soft drinks, organic tea, energy drinks, and mixers sweetened with stevia. All Zevia products are zero-calorie, sugar-free, gluten free, vegan, certified kosher, and certified by The Non-GMO Project. In June 2021, Zevia filed to go public with an IPO.
DOMH vs ZVIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.1M | $37.9M |
| Net Profit | $-131.8M | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | -438.1% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 220.4% | -4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12426.2% | 80.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.94 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-131.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.2M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.5M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -394.6% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.1% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.3% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -205.2% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | -438.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 246.4% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -400.5% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -104.2% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.1% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -398.0% | -18.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.94 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.27 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.02 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.67 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.01 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.5M | $25.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $69.4M | $51.0M |
| Total Assets | $112.9M | $63.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.2M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.6M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $53.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.9M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.3M | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | $80.3M |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.2M | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.7M | $-507.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $-507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $116.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-353.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $282.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
ZVIA
Segment breakdown not available.
