vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOMO, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.4M vs $71.2M, roughly 1.1× HANMI FINANCIAL CORP). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -13.1%, a 42.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs -0.5%). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($203.7M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
DOMO vs HAFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $71.2M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $21.2M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 17.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | 20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $62.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $60.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $796.4M |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $779.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $762.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $751.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $732.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | $736.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | $707.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-153.5M | $703.1M |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.7M | $7.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $206.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $203.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | 286.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | $356.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $25.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $29.2M |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 286.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 206.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | 82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 50.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
HAFC
Segment breakdown not available.