vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) and Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastern Bankshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.9M vs $245.4M, roughly 1.2× Douglas Elliman Inc.). Douglas Elliman Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 22.1%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eastern Bankshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (710.6% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Eastern Bankshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.6% CAGR vs 10.7%).
Douglas Elliman Inc. is a leading U.S.-based residential real estate brokerage firm. It offers luxury property sales, rentals, property management, and advisory solutions, serving high-net-worth clients across key metro markets including New York, California, Florida, and Texas.
Eastern Bank is a bank based in Boston, Massachusetts. Before de-mutualizing in 2020, it was the oldest and largest mutual bank in the United States and the largest community bank in Massachusetts.
DOUG vs EBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $245.4M | $295.9M |
| Net Profit | $68.6M | $65.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 27.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | 22.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 710.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1243.4% | -34.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $0.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $295.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $245.4M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.8M | $241.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.4M | $244.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.4M | $31.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.3M | $216.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.3M | $203.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $285.8M | $154.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $65.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.6M | $99.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.7M | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.7M | $100.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $-217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $60.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.2M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $26.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 41.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | -590.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.7% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 24.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 265.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.4% | 44.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | -699.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.5% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | 17.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.80 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.27 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $115.5M | $551.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $183.9M | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $444.4M | $30.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $551.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $115.5M | $507.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.0M | $703.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.3M | $948.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $609.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.9M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.1M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.6M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.6M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $30.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $444.4M | $30.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $25.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $25.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.9M | $25.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.9M | $25.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.7M | $25.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.9M | $21.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-17.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.4M | $432.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $157.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | $123.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6M | $47.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $283.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $54.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-575.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.21× | 4.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOUG
| Commissions And Other Brokerage Income | $240.3M | 98% |
| Property Management Income | $2.8M | 1% |
| Property Management | $2.2M | 1% |
EBC
Segment breakdown not available.
