vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC (DSGX) and GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GoPro, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($201.7M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.1× DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC). DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($62.1M vs $15.0M).
The Descartes Systems Group Inc. is a Canadian multinational technology company specializing in logistics software, supply chain management software, and cloud-based services for logistics businesses.
GoPro, Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman. It manufactures action cameras and develops its own mobile apps and video-editing software. Founded as Woodman Labs, Inc, the company is based in San Mateo, California.
DSGX vs GPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $201.7M |
| Net Profit | $38.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 76.9% | 31.8% |
| Operating Margin | 26.8% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | 21.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $201.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $162.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $152.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $134.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $200.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $163.4M | $258.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $186.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $155.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-46.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.7M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-339.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.9% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.2% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -26.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.1% | -13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -218.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.43 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $240.6M | $49.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $44.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $76.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $428.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.6M | $152.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $69.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.7M | $130.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $133.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $183.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $224.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $428.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $538.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $439.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $462.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $543.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $661.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $556.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $575.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.3M | $15.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $62.1M | $15.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.5% | 7.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $189.6M | $-24.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-25.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $605.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-98.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-58.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-25.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-111.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-99.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -43.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -63.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DSGX
Segment breakdown not available.
GPRO
| Subscription And Services | $106.3M | 53% |
| Other | $95.4M | 47% |