vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.9× KILROY REALTY CORP). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 6.3%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $27.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
DT vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $11.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
