vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $307.3M, roughly 1.7× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -20.7%, a 28.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -0.2%). Dynatrace, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.2M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
DT vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $398.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $404.4M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $-60.1M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 64.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | 60.9% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $-3.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $592.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $560.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $74.9M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | $55.3M |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
