vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $426.9M, roughly 1.2× Savers Value Village, Inc.). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -3.3%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 8.1%). Dynatrace, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.2M vs $-6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
DT vs SVV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.5M | $426.9M |
| Net Profit | $40.1M | $-14.0M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.9% | -164.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.8M | $426.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.3M | $417.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.2M | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.1M | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.2M | $386.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $354.2M |
| Q4 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $-467.0K |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $63.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $750.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $414.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $160.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.9M | $102.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $750.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $414.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $423.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $413.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $421.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $432.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $419.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $395.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.8M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.2M | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $465.5M | $25.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.8M | $419.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.7M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.4M | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.9M | $-28.3M |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.62× | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.97× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
