vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.0M vs $28.4M, roughly 1.8× Fangdd Network Group Ltd.). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 35.0% vs -18.7%, a 53.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fangdd Network Group Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.4% vs 16.0%).

Fangdd Network Group Ltd. operates a leading digital real estate service platform in China, offering property listing, transaction matching, home furnishing consultation and operational support for buyers, sellers, agents and real estate development enterprises across multiple domestic city tiers.

DUO vs LB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LB
LB
1.8× larger
LB
$51.0M
$28.4M
DUO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
DUO
DUO
+31.4% gap
DUO
47.4%
16.0%
LB
Higher net margin
LB
LB
53.8% more per $
LB
35.0%
-18.7%
DUO

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Revenue
$28.4M
$51.0M
Net Profit
$-5.3M
$17.9M
Gross Margin
9.1%
Operating Margin
-35.3%
57.2%
Net Margin
-18.7%
35.0%
Revenue YoY
47.4%
16.0%
Net Profit YoY
-322.5%
15.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.35

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
$51.0M
Q4 25
$56.8M
Q3 25
$50.8M
Q2 25
$28.4M
$47.5M
Q1 25
$44.0M
Q4 24
$36.5M
Q3 24
$28.5M
Q2 24
$19.3M
$26.0M
Net Profit
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
$17.9M
Q4 25
$8.1M
Q3 25
$8.1M
Q2 25
$-5.3M
$7.5M
Q1 25
$6.5M
Q4 24
$49.3M
Q3 24
$2.7M
Q2 24
$2.4M
$-57.7M
Gross Margin
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
9.1%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
12.5%
Operating Margin
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
57.2%
Q4 25
60.0%
Q3 25
60.8%
Q2 25
-35.3%
60.0%
Q1 25
57.0%
Q4 24
49.4%
Q3 24
11.2%
Q2 24
-49.0%
-197.4%
Net Margin
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
35.0%
Q4 25
14.2%
Q3 25
15.9%
Q2 25
-18.7%
15.8%
Q1 25
14.7%
Q4 24
135.2%
Q3 24
9.3%
Q2 24
12.4%
-222.1%
EPS (diluted)
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.24
Q3 25
$0.26
Q2 25
$-1.35
$0.24
Q1 25
$0.20
Q4 24
Q3 24
$-0.04
Q2 24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$24.9M
$29.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$433.0K
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$53.1M
Total Assets
$94.8M
$1.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
$29.7M
Q4 25
$30.7M
Q3 25
$28.3M
Q2 25
$24.9M
$20.3M
Q1 25
$14.9M
Q4 24
$37.0M
Q3 24
$14.4M
Q2 24
$18.9M
$24.6M
Total Debt
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
$433.0K
Q4 25
$570.7M
Q3 25
$366.1M
Q2 25
$370.9M
Q1 25
$375.5M
Q4 24
$385.5M
Q3 24
$242.4M
Q2 24
$360.8M
Stockholders' Equity
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$340.3M
Q3 25
$272.0M
Q2 25
$53.1M
$266.4M
Q1 25
$217.0M
Q4 24
$211.8M
Q3 24
$97.2M
Q2 24
$29.4M
$296.4M
Total Assets
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$94.8M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.0B
Q4 24
$1.0B
Q3 24
$689.9M
Q2 24
$92.7M
$710.5M
Debt / Equity
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.68×
Q3 25
1.35×
Q2 25
1.39×
Q1 25
1.73×
Q4 24
1.82×
Q3 24
2.49×
Q2 24
1.22×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-3.0M
$41.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$40.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
80.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.30×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$232.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
$41.1M
Q4 25
$126.3M
Q3 25
$34.9M
Q2 25
$-3.0M
$37.3M
Q1 25
$15.9M
Q4 24
$67.6M
Q3 24
$7.5M
Q2 24
$-808.0K
$16.0M
Free Cash Flow
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
$40.9M
Q4 25
$122.0M
Q3 25
$33.7M
Q2 25
$36.1M
Q1 25
$15.8M
Q4 24
$66.7M
Q3 24
$7.1M
Q2 24
$-957.0K
$15.7M
FCF Margin
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
80.3%
Q4 25
214.9%
Q3 25
66.3%
Q2 25
75.9%
Q1 25
36.0%
Q4 24
182.6%
Q3 24
25.1%
Q2 24
-5.0%
60.4%
Capex Intensity
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.5%
Q3 25
2.3%
Q2 25
2.6%
Q1 25
0.2%
Q4 24
2.7%
Q3 24
1.1%
Q2 24
0.8%
1.4%
Cash Conversion
DUO
DUO
LB
LB
Q1 26
2.30×
Q4 25
15.68×
Q3 25
4.31×
Q2 25
4.98×
Q1 25
2.46×
Q4 24
1.37×
Q3 24
2.80×
Q2 24
-0.34×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DUO
DUO

Segment breakdown not available.

LB
LB

Other$14.2M28%
Easements and other surface-related revenues$11.6M23%
Surface use royalties - related party$11.0M22%
Resource sales$5.2M10%
Resource royalties$4.3M8%
Easements and other surface-related revenues - related party$3.2M6%
Resource royalties - related party$1.3M2%
Resource sales - related party$205.0K0%

Related Comparisons