vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT) and SOLESENCE, INC. (SLSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOLESENCE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.3× DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.). SOLESENCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.3% vs -33.8%, a 35.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs 12.5%).
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
DUOT vs SLSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $12.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $163.0K |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -33.8% | 1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 547.5% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 129.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $163.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $80.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $-559.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $856.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $893.0K |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -36.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -211.2% | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.1% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.2% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -212.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.6M | $17.6M |
| Total Assets | $63.4M | $50.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $429.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6K | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $48.6M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $18.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.8M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -196.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 167.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 11.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-37.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-654.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-565.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-404.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | -196.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -69.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -105.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 166.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -90.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -184.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -39.9% |
| Q4 25 | 167.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -90.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
SLSN
Segment breakdown not available.
