vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and SOLESENCE, INC. (SLSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $12.5M, roughly 1.1× SOLESENCE, INC.). SOLESENCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.3% vs -13.2%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 12.5%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
LSF vs SLSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $12.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $163.0K |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 129.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $163.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $80.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-559.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $856.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $893.0K |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $17.6M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $50.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $429.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $18.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $38.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 11.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-654.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-565.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-404.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -39.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -90.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
SLSN
Segment breakdown not available.