vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DXC Technology Co (DXC) and RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DXC Technology Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.5× RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs 3.4%, a 20.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DXC Technology Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.0% vs -36.8%). Over the past eight quarters, DXC Technology Co's revenue compounded faster (-2.9% CAGR vs -11.9%).
DXC Technology Company is an American multinational information technology (IT) services and consulting company headquartered in Ashburn, Virginia.
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.
DXC vs RNR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $107.0M | $515.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 23.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.0% | -36.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 87.7% | 72.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.61 | $6.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $760.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.0M | $916.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | $835.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $264.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.0M | $-189.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $503.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.61 | $16.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $19.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $17.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.42 | $3.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $-3.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $22.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $9.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $53.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $10.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $53.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6B | $54.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4B | $54.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2B | $53.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0B | $50.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5B | $52.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4B | $51.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.93× | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.22× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $414.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $359.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.87× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $315.0M | $157.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $650.0M | $778.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $238.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $365.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $238.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $568.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.87× | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.36× | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.63× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.64× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.15× | 2.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DXC
| GIS Segment | $1.6B | 50% |
| CES Segment | $1.3B | 40% |
| Insurance Segment | $321.0M | 10% |
RNR
Segment breakdown not available.
