vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastern Bankshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.9M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.2× PicoCELA Inc.). Eastern Bankshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.1% vs -125.2%, a 147.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Eastern Bank is a bank based in Boston, Massachusetts. Before de-mutualizing in 2020, it was the oldest and largest mutual bank in the United States and the largest community bank in Massachusetts.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
EBC vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $295.9M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $65.3M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 22.1% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 289.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.29 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $295.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.1M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $65.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-217.7M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -590.9% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 265.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -699.2% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $551.7M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $30.6B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $551.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $507.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $703.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $948.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $609.0M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $30.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $432.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $157.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.3M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $283.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.67× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EBC
| ALLL / total nonperforming loans ("NPLs") | $238.2M | 80% |
| Other | $51.6M | 17% |
| Return on average shareholders' equity | $6.1M | 2% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |