vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.9M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.6× ECB Bancorp, Inc.). ECB Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.3% vs -2.0%, a 29.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ECB Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.8% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, ECB Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.8% CAGR vs 18.2%).
ECB Bancorp, Inc. (MD) is a US-based bank holding company. It offers a full suite of retail and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, consumer loans, commercial financing and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individuals and small-to-mid enterprises across local markets in Maryland.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
ECBK vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.7% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 27.3% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.8% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 79.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $791.0K | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.7% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.18 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.09 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.8M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $171.9M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.8M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.9M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.4M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.8M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.7M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.9M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.3M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.3M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.6M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.3M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.0M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.5M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 94.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-631.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $861.0K | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-649.0K | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 94.7% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.0% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 86.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.55× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.65× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.31× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.76× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECBK
Segment breakdown not available.
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
