vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $201.7M, roughly 1.9× GoPro, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 13.9%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
GoPro, Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman. It manufactures action cameras and develops its own mobile apps and video-editing software. Founded as Woodman Labs, Inc, the company is based in San Mateo, California.
ECO vs GPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $201.7M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.8% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $201.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $162.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $152.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $134.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $200.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $258.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $186.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $155.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-21.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-46.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-339.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | -33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | -25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -26.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -218.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $49.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $44.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $76.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $428.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $152.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $69.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $130.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $133.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.7M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $76.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $183.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $184.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $224.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $428.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $538.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $439.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $462.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $543.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $661.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $556.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $575.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $15.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-24.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $605.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-98.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-58.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-25.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-111.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-99.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -43.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -63.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
GPRO
| Subscription And Services | $106.3M | 53% |
| Other | $95.4M | 47% |
