vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $253.4M, roughly 1.6× Palomar Holdings, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
ECO vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $131.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $118.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $532.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $501.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
