vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and SouthState Bank Corp (SSB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SouthState Bank Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($661.7M vs $393.2M, roughly 1.7× Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.). Over the past eight quarters, SouthState Bank Corp's revenue compounded faster (37.4% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
SouthState Bank, based in Winter Haven, Florida, is an American bank and a subsidiary of SouthState Corporation, a bank holding company. As of May 26, 2025, the company had 371 branches in South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Virginia, Colorado and Texas.
ECO vs SSB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393.2M | $661.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $225.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 15.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 153.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $661.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.2M | $581.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.0M | $599.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $577.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $544.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.1M | $369.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.4M | $351.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.4M | $350.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $225.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $247.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $246.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $144.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $143.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $132.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 54.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 53.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 101.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.7% | 50.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.7% | 49.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.28 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $116.6M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.1M | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $68.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.1M | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $428.3M | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $5.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $68.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $67.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $65.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $46.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $45.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $111.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.2M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-126.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $354.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-246.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $215.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-139.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-254.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $117.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 92.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -72.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
SSB
| Net Interest Income | $561.6M | 85% |
| Noninterest Income | $100.1M | 15% |