vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $257.0M, roughly 1.3× GCI Liberty, Inc.). ECARX Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -21.4% vs -150.6%, a 129.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. GCI Liberty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.0M vs $-86.5M).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
ECX vs GLIBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $257.0M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $-387.0M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | -189.9% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | -150.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $-13.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $257.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $261.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-387.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $27.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -189.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -150.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $124.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $985.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $124.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $104.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $985.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $987.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $76.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | $21.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 21.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $226.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
