vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Emerald Holding, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.7M vs $109.4M, roughly 1.2× TRICO BANCSHARES ). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs -22.8%, a 274.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerald Holding, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs 9.0%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $11.7M). Over the past eight quarters, TRICO BANCSHARES 's revenue compounded faster (5.4% CAGR vs -0.3%).
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
EEX vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.7M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $-30.2M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | -22.8% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -692.2% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.7M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.4M | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.2M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.4M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $100.9M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.8M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $100.9M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.4M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $276.8M | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.8M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.9M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.2M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $186.8M | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | $338.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-90.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $9.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.7M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.4M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.66× | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
TCBK
Segment breakdown not available.
