vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ellington Financial Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.2M vs $62.2M, roughly 1.3× Ouster, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Ellington Management Group is an American hedge fund firm. As of June 2019, the firm was reportedly managing $8.5 billion in structured products and other credit instruments.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
EFC vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $78.2M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $22.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 28.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -26.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $78.2M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.2M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.5M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.5M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.9M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | -93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.2% | -99.5% |
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.4% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.2% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.4% | -88.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | -91.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.62 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $19.4B | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.8M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.3M | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.4M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $217.7M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.5M | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.5M | $187.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $167.2M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.8B | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1B | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3B | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.1B | $309.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1B | $317.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-925.5M | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -40.92× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-925.5M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-290.4M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-210.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-126.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-430.5M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-141.7M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.6M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.5M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -81.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -27.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -40.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.84× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
