vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZIPRECRUITER, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($111.7M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.4× Ellington Financial Inc.). Ellington Financial Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.9% vs -0.7%, a 29.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ellington Financial Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Ellington Financial Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -4.4%).
Ellington Management Group is an American hedge fund firm. As of June 2019, the firm was reportedly managing $8.5 billion in structured products and other credit instruments.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
EFC vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $78.2M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $22.6M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 28.9% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -26.2% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $78.2M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.5M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.9M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.2M | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.5M | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.5M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.9M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.2% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.62 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $19.4B | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.8M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.3M | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.4M | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $217.7M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.5M | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.5M | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.8B | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3B | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0B | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.1B | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1B | $662.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-925.5M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -40.92× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-925.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-290.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-210.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-126.4M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-430.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-141.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.6M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.5M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -40.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.84× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.69× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EFC
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
