vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($260.4M vs $170.5M, roughly 1.5× Employers Holdings, Inc.). On growth, Smith Douglas Homes Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.4% vs -21.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Employers Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered insurance holding company that specializes in offering workers' compensation insurance and customized risk management services primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises across the United States. It mainly serves clients in low-to-medium hazard industries, helping them mitigate workplace safety risks and meet relevant regulatory requirements for employee protection.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
EIG vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $170.5M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.3% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $170.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $188.5M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.6M | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.6M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $220.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $3.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.93 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.23 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.52 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.14 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $169.9M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $955.7M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $169.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.9M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.9M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $17.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $955.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $955.7M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $62.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $429.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.4M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $39.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIG
Segment breakdown not available.
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
