vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) and Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Employers Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($170.5M vs $120.9M, roughly 1.4× Sprout Social, Inc.). On growth, Sprout Social, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -21.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Sprout Social, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Employers Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered insurance holding company that specializes in offering workers' compensation insurance and customized risk management services primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises across the United States. It mainly serves clients in low-to-medium hazard industries, helping them mitigate workplace safety risks and meet relevant regulatory requirements for employee protection.
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
EIG vs SPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $170.5M | $120.9M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | -21.3% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $170.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $188.5M | $120.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | $111.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.6M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.6M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $99.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-16.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -16.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | -10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -17.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.93 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.23 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.52 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.14 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $169.9M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $955.7M | $203.4M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $523.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $169.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.9M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.4M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.9M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $80.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $955.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $955.7M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $194.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $175.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $152.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $523.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $481.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $422.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $424.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $428.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $388.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $393.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $39.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.4M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.