vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edison International (EIX) and Freeport-McMoRan (FCX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Freeport-McMoRan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.0× Edison International). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 10.7%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Edison International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs -10.4%). Freeport-McMoRan produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-312.0M vs $-319.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs -7.9%).
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., often called Freeport, is an American mining company based in the Freeport-McMoRan Center, in Phoenix, Arizona. The company is the world's largest producer of molybdenum, a major copper producer and operates the world's largest gold mine, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia.
EIX vs FCX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $5.3B |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $565.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.4% |
| Operating Margin | 52.8% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 35.4% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 443.5% | -21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.78 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $565.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $793.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $721.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 52.8% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 32.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | $4.78 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.16 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.72 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.0M | $3.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $38.0B | $9.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6B | $18.9B |
| Total Assets | $94.0B | $58.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.16× | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $158.0M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.0M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.0M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $992.0M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | $38.0B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6B | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.7B | $9.4B |
| Q4 25 | $17.6B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $17.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2B | $17.0B |
| Q4 25 | $94.0B | $58.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.5B | $56.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.8B | $56.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.4B | $56.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6B | $54.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.7B | $55.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.8B | $54.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6B | $54.2B |
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.26× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.29× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $693.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-319.0M | $-312.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.1% | -5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 36.3% | 19.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.85× | 1.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-715.0M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $882.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $329.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $-319.0M | $-312.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $608.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-830.0M | $934.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.0M | $-114.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-326.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.0M | $673.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1B | $840.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-236.0M | $642.0M |
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.8% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 36.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.4% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.44× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.79× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
FCX
| Morenci | $2.5B | 47% |
| Grasberg Segment | $964.0M | 18% |
| Copper In Concentrates | $934.0M | 18% |
| Molybdenum | $541.0M | 10% |
| Gold | $388.0M | 7% |
