vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edison International (EIX) and PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. (PAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.8B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.7× Edison International). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 2.6%, a 32.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Edison International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 14.6%). PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.1M vs $-319.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 9.0%).
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) is an American transportation services company headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. It operates automotive and commercial truck dealers principally in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe, and distributes commercial vehicles, engines, power systems, and related parts and services principally in Australia and New Zealand. Additionally, PAG owns 28.9% of Penske Transportation Solutions, a business that manages a fleet of over 400,000 trucks, ...
EIX vs PAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $8.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $228.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.9% |
| Operating Margin | 52.8% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 35.4% | 2.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 443.5% | -3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.78 | $3.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $250.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $244.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $236.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0M | $226.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.0M | $241.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $215.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.7% |
| Q4 25 | 52.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $4.78 | $3.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.16 | $3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $3.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.72 | $3.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $3.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $3.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $3.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.0M | $64.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $38.0B | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6B | $5.6B |
| Total Assets | $94.0B | $17.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.16× | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $158.0M | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.0M | $72.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.0M | $115.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $992.0M | $116.9M |
| Q4 25 | $38.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.7B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $17.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2B | $4.8B |
| Q4 25 | $94.0B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.5B | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.4B | $16.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.7B | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.8B | $16.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6B | $16.1B |
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.12× | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.26× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | 0.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.26× | 0.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.29× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $123.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-319.0M | $25.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.1% | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 36.3% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.85× | 0.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-715.0M | $650.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $123.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $379.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $882.0M | $189.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $282.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $271.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $329.0M | $235.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $456.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-319.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $300.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-830.0M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.0M | $206.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-326.0M | $131.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.0M | $190.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1B | $135.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-236.0M | $353.5M |
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.8% | 4.7% |
| Q4 25 | 36.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 1.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.44× | 0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.79× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
PAG
| New Vehicle | $3.9B | 44% |
| Used Vehicle | $2.3B | 26% |
| Service And Parts | $953.6M | 11% |
| Retail Commercial Truck Dealership Segment | $725.4M | 8% |
| Other | $414.5M | 5% |
| Commercial Vehicle Distribution And Other | $303.3M | 3% |
| Finance And Insurance Net | $221.9M | 3% |
