vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of E-Home Household Service Holdings Ltd (EJH) and JOINT Corp (JYNT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
E-Home Household Service Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.4M vs $15.2M, roughly 1.7× JOINT Corp). JOINT Corp runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -19.2%, a 25.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JOINT Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs -0.0%).
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited is a China-based professional household services provider. It offers in-home services including home cleaning, childcare support, elder care, maternity care, and domestic worker placement, serving urban residential and small commercial clients across multiple Chinese regions.
The Joint Corp is a leading operator and franchisor of chiropractic care clinics primarily serving the U.S. market. It offers accessible, affordable routine chiropractic services, membership-based care plans, and caters to consumers seeking non-invasive musculoskeletal pain management and wellness support.
EJH vs JYNT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.4M | $15.2M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $991.1K |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | -19.7% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | -19.2% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.3% | 5510.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.1M | $991.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $855.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $967.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.9M | $17.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $947.0K |
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | 81.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 78.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 90.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 90.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 90.9% |
| Q4 25 | -19.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | -19.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $173.0M | $23.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.9M | $15.1M |
| Total Assets | $278.1M | $61.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $173.0M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.7M |
| Q4 25 | $265.9M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | $278.1M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $69.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.1M | $83.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $334.7K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-1.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $868.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-322.4K | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-973.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $334.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $363.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 532.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EJH
| Installation and maintenance | $16.9M | 64% |
| Housekeeping | $8.6M | 33% |
| Other | $857.6K | 3% |
JYNT
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.8M | 84% |
| Transferred Over Time | $2.4M | 16% |
