vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Estée Lauder Companies (The) (EL) and Trane Technologies (TT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Trane Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.0B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.2× Estée Lauder Companies (The)). Trane Technologies runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs 3.8%, a 8.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trane Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.0% vs 5.6%). Estée Lauder Companies (The) produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $573.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Estée Lauder Companies (The)'s revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs -3.2%).

Estée Lauder was an American businesswoman. She co-founded her eponymous cosmetics company with her husband, Joseph Lauter. Lauder was the only woman on Time magazine's 1998 list of the 20 most influential business geniuses of the 20th century.

Trane Technologies plc is an Irish domiciled company focused on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration systems. The company traces its corporate history back more than 150 years and was created after a series of mergers and spin-offs. In 2008, HVAC manufacturer Trane was acquired by Ingersoll Rand, a US industrial tools manufacturer. In 2020, the tools business was spun off as Ingersoll Rand and the remaining company was renamed Trane Technologies.

EL vs TT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TT
TT
1.2× larger
TT
$5.0B
$4.2B
EL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TT
TT
+0.4% gap
TT
6.0%
5.6%
EL
Higher net margin
TT
TT
8.0% more per $
TT
11.9%
3.8%
EL
More free cash flow
EL
EL
$444.0M more FCF
EL
$1.0B
$573.0M
TT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EL
EL
Annualised
EL
3.6%
-3.2%
TT

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EL
EL
TT
TT
Revenue
$4.2B
$5.0B
Net Profit
$162.0M
$589.5M
Gross Margin
76.5%
165.2%
Operating Margin
9.5%
15.6%
Net Margin
3.8%
11.9%
Revenue YoY
5.6%
6.0%
Net Profit YoY
127.5%
-3.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
$5.0B
Q4 25
$4.2B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$3.4B
$5.7B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$4.7B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$4.9B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$5.4B
Q2 24
$3.9B
$5.3B
Net Profit
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
$589.5M
Q4 25
$162.0M
$591.3M
Q3 25
$47.0M
$847.6M
Q2 25
$-546.0M
$874.8M
Q1 25
$159.0M
$604.9M
Q4 24
$-590.0M
$604.3M
Q3 24
$-156.0M
$772.0M
Q2 24
$-286.0M
$755.3M
Gross Margin
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
165.2%
Q4 25
76.5%
Q3 25
73.4%
36.9%
Q2 25
72.0%
37.6%
Q1 25
75.0%
35.8%
Q4 24
76.1%
Q3 24
72.4%
36.3%
Q2 24
71.8%
36.5%
Operating Margin
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
15.6%
Q4 25
9.5%
15.9%
Q3 25
4.9%
20.3%
Q2 25
-11.4%
20.3%
Q1 25
8.6%
17.5%
Q4 24
-14.5%
16.6%
Q3 24
-3.6%
18.8%
Q2 24
-6.0%
19.5%
Net Margin
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
11.9%
Q4 25
3.8%
11.5%
Q3 25
1.4%
14.8%
Q2 25
-16.0%
15.2%
Q1 25
4.5%
12.9%
Q4 24
-14.7%
12.4%
Q3 24
-4.6%
14.2%
Q2 24
-7.4%
14.2%
EPS (diluted)
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.44
$2.64
Q3 25
$0.13
$3.78
Q2 25
$-1.52
$3.89
Q1 25
$0.44
$2.67
Q4 24
$-1.64
$2.65
Q3 24
$-0.43
$3.39
Q2 24
$-0.79
$3.30

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EL
EL
TT
TT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.3B
$4.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.0B
$8.6B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$22.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.82×
0.54×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.8B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$1.6B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Total Debt
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
$4.6B
Q4 25
$7.3B
$4.6B
Q3 25
$7.3B
Q2 25
$7.3B
Q1 25
$7.3B
Q4 24
$7.3B
$4.8B
Q3 24
$7.3B
Q2 24
$7.3B
Stockholders' Equity
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
$8.6B
Q4 25
$4.0B
$8.6B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$8.3B
Q2 25
$3.9B
$7.8B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$7.5B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$7.5B
Q3 24
$5.1B
$7.6B
Q2 24
$5.3B
$6.9B
Total Assets
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
$22.8B
Q4 25
$19.6B
$21.4B
Q3 25
$19.3B
$21.4B
Q2 25
$19.9B
$21.0B
Q1 25
$19.9B
$20.1B
Q4 24
$19.8B
$20.1B
Q3 24
$21.3B
$20.9B
Q2 24
$21.7B
$20.2B
Debt / Equity
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
0.54×
Q4 25
1.82×
0.54×
Q3 25
1.88×
Q2 25
1.89×
Q1 25
1.68×
Q4 24
1.75×
0.64×
Q3 24
1.44×
Q2 24
1.37×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EL
EL
TT
TT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.0B
$573.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.0%
11.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.6%
1.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.94×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.1B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$-340.0M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$601.0M
$692.1M
Q1 25
$284.0M
$339.5M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$899.9M
Q3 24
$-670.0M
$1.3B
Q2 24
$889.0M
$695.9M
Free Cash Flow
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
$573.0M
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$-436.0M
$935.6M
Q2 25
$394.0M
$602.2M
Q1 25
$162.0M
$220.6M
Q4 24
$925.0M
$774.3M
Q3 24
$-811.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$672.0M
$623.0M
FCF Margin
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
11.5%
Q4 25
24.0%
Q3 25
-12.5%
16.3%
Q2 25
11.6%
10.5%
Q1 25
4.6%
4.7%
Q4 24
23.1%
15.9%
Q3 24
-24.1%
22.3%
Q2 24
17.4%
11.7%
Capex Intensity
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
1.6%
Q4 25
2.6%
Q3 25
2.8%
1.2%
Q2 25
6.1%
1.6%
Q1 25
3.4%
2.5%
Q4 24
3.3%
2.6%
Q3 24
4.2%
1.6%
Q2 24
5.6%
1.4%
Cash Conversion
EL
EL
TT
TT
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.94×
1.96×
Q3 25
-7.23×
1.18×
Q2 25
0.79×
Q1 25
1.79×
0.56×
Q4 24
1.49×
Q3 24
1.69×
Q2 24
0.92×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EL
EL

Skin Care$2.1B49%
Makeup$1.2B28%
Fragrance$812.0M19%
Hair Care$168.0M4%
Other$31.0M1%

TT
TT

Americas$4.0B80%
EMEA$639.5M13%
Asia Pacific$331.5M7%

Related Comparisons