vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Envela Corp (ELA) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $80.5M, roughly 1.8× Envela Corp). Envela Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -68.1%, a 75.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.7% vs 66.6%). Envela Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.7M vs $-68.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Envela Corp's revenue compounded faster (42.1% CAGR vs 31.9%).

Envela Corporation is a U.S.-based company that provides recommerce services aimed at extending product lifecycles and reducing resource consumption. The company operates through two primary segments: consumer and commercial.

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.

ELA vs FIP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FIP
FIP
1.8× larger
FIP
$143.5M
$80.5M
ELA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FIP
FIP
+11.1% gap
FIP
77.7%
66.6%
ELA
Higher net margin
ELA
ELA
75.5% more per $
ELA
7.4%
-68.1%
FIP
More free cash flow
ELA
ELA
$64.9M more FCF
ELA
$-3.7M
$-68.6M
FIP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ELA
ELA
Annualised
ELA
42.1%
31.9%
FIP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Revenue
$80.5M
$143.5M
Net Profit
$6.0M
$-97.7M
Gross Margin
20.5%
Operating Margin
9.4%
-45.7%
Net Margin
7.4%
-68.1%
Revenue YoY
66.6%
77.7%
Net Profit YoY
274.6%
21.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.22
$-1.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$80.5M
$143.5M
Q3 25
$57.4M
$140.6M
Q2 25
$54.9M
$122.3M
Q1 25
$48.3M
$96.2M
Q4 24
$48.3M
$80.8M
Q3 24
$46.9M
$83.3M
Q2 24
$45.3M
$84.9M
Q1 24
$39.9M
$82.5M
Net Profit
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$6.0M
$-97.7M
Q3 25
$3.4M
$-104.5M
Q2 25
$2.8M
$-70.0M
Q1 25
$2.5M
$120.2M
Q4 24
$1.6M
$-124.7M
Q3 24
$1.7M
$-43.0M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$-48.1M
Q1 24
$1.9M
$-50.3M
Gross Margin
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
20.5%
Q3 25
22.8%
Q2 25
22.6%
Q1 25
24.8%
Q4 24
23.1%
Q3 24
24.4%
Q2 24
25.1%
Q1 24
25.9%
Operating Margin
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
9.4%
-45.7%
Q3 25
7.3%
-70.8%
Q2 25
5.9%
-56.4%
Q1 25
6.5%
81.8%
Q4 24
3.9%
-152.7%
Q3 24
4.3%
-51.7%
Q2 24
4.2%
-56.4%
Q1 24
5.9%
-58.8%
Net Margin
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
7.4%
-68.1%
Q3 25
5.8%
-74.4%
Q2 25
5.0%
-57.2%
Q1 25
5.2%
125.0%
Q4 24
3.3%
-154.4%
Q3 24
3.6%
-51.6%
Q2 24
3.5%
-56.7%
Q1 24
4.8%
-60.9%
EPS (diluted)
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$0.22
$-1.04
Q3 25
$0.13
$-1.38
Q2 25
$0.11
$-0.73
Q1 25
$0.10
$0.89
Q4 24
$0.07
$-1.21
Q3 24
$0.06
$-0.45
Q2 24
$0.06
$-0.52
Q1 24
$0.07
$-0.54

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$57.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.9M
$3.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$67.1M
$21.3M
Total Assets
$96.0M
$5.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.15×
176.99×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$57.4M
Q3 25
$34.7M
Q2 25
$33.6M
Q1 25
$26.3M
Q4 24
$27.8M
Q3 24
$20.3M
Q2 24
$33.1M
Q1 24
$19.8M
$23.0M
Total Debt
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$9.9M
$3.8B
Q3 25
$12.5M
$3.7B
Q2 25
$13.0M
$3.1B
Q1 25
$13.2M
$2.8B
Q4 24
$13.5M
$1.6B
Q3 24
$13.8M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$14.3M
$1.6B
Q1 24
$14.6M
$1.3B
Stockholders' Equity
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$67.1M
$21.3M
Q3 25
$61.1M
$181.1M
Q2 25
$57.8M
$375.5M
Q1 25
$55.1M
$476.2M
Q4 24
$52.7M
$202.7M
Q3 24
$51.1M
$370.8M
Q2 24
$50.2M
$394.8M
Q1 24
$49.3M
$402.5M
Total Assets
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$96.0M
$5.7B
Q3 25
$90.9M
$5.5B
Q2 25
$82.7M
$4.4B
Q1 25
$79.7M
$4.1B
Q4 24
$77.9M
$2.4B
Q3 24
$77.4M
$2.4B
Q2 24
$73.8M
$2.5B
Q1 24
$74.7M
$2.3B
Debt / Equity
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
0.15×
176.99×
Q3 25
0.20×
20.59×
Q2 25
0.23×
8.21×
Q1 25
0.24×
5.79×
Q4 24
0.26×
7.84×
Q3 24
0.27×
4.14×
Q2 24
0.29×
3.94×
Q1 24
0.30×
3.34×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-3.5M
$-2.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-3.7M
$-68.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-4.6%
-47.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.2%
45.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.59×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.4M
$-398.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$-3.5M
$-2.8M
Q3 25
$2.4M
$-24.4M
Q2 25
$2.6M
$-5.2M
Q1 25
$1.1M
$-85.7M
Q4 24
$3.7M
$-8.1M
Q3 24
$3.4M
$14.2M
Q2 24
$-789.5K
$-17.6M
Q1 24
$3.8M
$-3.9M
Free Cash Flow
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
$-3.7M
$-68.6M
Q3 25
$2.2M
$-90.7M
Q2 25
$2.1M
$-87.5M
Q1 25
$746.6K
$-151.7M
Q4 24
$3.2M
$-34.3M
Q3 24
$1.5M
$-11.7M
Q2 24
$-1.3M
$-32.1M
Q1 24
$3.3M
$-16.7M
FCF Margin
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
-4.6%
-47.8%
Q3 25
3.8%
-64.5%
Q2 25
3.9%
-71.6%
Q1 25
1.5%
-157.7%
Q4 24
6.7%
-42.4%
Q3 24
3.1%
-14.0%
Q2 24
-2.9%
-37.9%
Q1 24
8.4%
-20.3%
Capex Intensity
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
0.2%
45.9%
Q3 25
0.4%
47.2%
Q2 25
0.8%
67.3%
Q1 25
0.8%
68.6%
Q4 24
1.0%
32.5%
Q3 24
4.2%
31.1%
Q2 24
1.1%
17.2%
Q1 24
1.1%
15.6%
Cash Conversion
ELA
ELA
FIP
FIP
Q4 25
-0.59×
Q3 25
0.72×
Q2 25
0.94×
Q1 25
0.45×
-0.71×
Q4 24
2.34×
Q3 24
2.05×
Q2 24
-0.50×
Q1 24
1.99×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ELA
ELA

Consumer Segment$67.7M84%
Commercial Segment$12.8M16%

FIP
FIP

Power Revenues$45.9M32%
Rail Revenue$44.6M31%
Service Other$22.8M16%
Gas Revenues$15.3M11%
Roadside Services Revenues$11.5M8%
Rapauno$1.2M1%

Related Comparisons