vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($226.2M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.6× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -68.1%, a 68.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.7% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.9% CAGR vs 3.1%).
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
FIP vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $226.2M |
| Net Profit | $-97.7M | $180.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | -45.7% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | -68.1% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.7% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | -74.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.04 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.6M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.3M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.2M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.8M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | $212.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-97.7M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-104.5M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.2M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-124.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.1M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -45.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -70.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -58.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -68.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 125.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -154.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -60.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.04 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.38 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.89 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.45 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.4M | $158.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $742.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 176.99× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $57.4M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.7M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.6M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.8M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.1M | $332.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.1M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $476.2M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.7M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.8M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.8M | $512.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $402.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $631.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 176.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-68.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -47.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 45.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-398.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.4M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-68.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-90.7M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-151.7M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.5% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -71.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -157.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.71× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIP
| Power Revenues | $45.9M | 32% |
| Rail Revenue | $44.6M | 31% |
| Service Other | $22.8M | 16% |
| Gas Revenues | $15.3M | 11% |
| Roadside Services Revenues | $11.5M | 8% |
| Rapauno | $1.2M | 1% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.
