vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Envela Corp (ELA) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Envela Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.5M vs $62.2M, roughly 1.3× Ouster, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs 66.6%). Envela Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.7M vs $-37.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 42.1%).
Envela Corporation is a U.S.-based company that provides recommerce services aimed at extending product lifecycles and reducing resource consumption. The company operates through two primary segments: consumer and commercial.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
ELA vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.5M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 20.5% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 66.6% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 274.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.4M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.9M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.3M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.9M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.8% | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.9% | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | -93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | -99.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | -88.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | -91.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $67.1M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $96.0M | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $187.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $67.1M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.1M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.1M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.7M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.1M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.3M | $167.2M |
| Q4 25 | $96.0M | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.9M | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.7M | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.7M | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.9M | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.4M | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $309.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.7M | $317.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.30× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.7M | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.6% | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4M | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-789.5K | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.7M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $746.6K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | -81.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | -27.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.99× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELA
| Consumer Segment | $67.7M | 84% |
| Commercial Segment | $12.8M | 16% |
OUST
Segment breakdown not available.