vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and MIDDLEBY Corp (MIDD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIDDLEBY Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.4M vs $489.5M, roughly 1.8× e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.). e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs 4.3%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.8% vs -30.6%). MIDDLEBY Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($165.5M vs $52.8M).
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. is an American cosmetics brand based in Oakland, California. It was founded by Joseph Shamah and Scott Vincent Borba in 2004. The company sells items include bath and skin-care products, mineral-based makeup, professional tools, eyeliners, lipstick, glosses, blushes, bronzers, brushes and mascara. Its products are sold in 18 countries and in several stores including Target, Kmart, Dollar General and Walmart. Over half the company's sales come from its website, which is als...
The Middleby Corporation is a publicly traded American company based in Elgin, Illinois. The company manufactures commercial cooking equipment, industrial processing equipment, and residential appliances. The commercial cooking equipment side of Middleby does business with 97 out of the top 100 food service chains in the United States and internationally.
ELF vs MIDD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $489.5M | $866.4M |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $36.9M |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 17.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.8% | -30.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 128.1% | -67.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.65 | $0.74 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $489.5M | $866.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.9M | $982.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.7M | $977.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $906.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $942.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $991.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $926.9M |
| Q4 25 | $39.4M | $36.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-513.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3M | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $112.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $86.6M |
| Q4 25 | 71.0% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.4% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.1% | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.4% |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | -56.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.8% |
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | -52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.65 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $-10.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $1.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $196.8M | $222.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $816.7M | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | 0.78× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $196.8M | $222.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.4M | $175.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.0M | $511.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $745.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $689.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $606.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $459.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $341.0M |
| Q4 25 | $816.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $831.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $256.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $804.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $59.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.8M | $165.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.8% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.51× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $530.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $239.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $149.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $140.9M |
| Q4 25 | $52.8M | $165.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.1M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $127.2M |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
