vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) and MIDDLEBY Corp (MIDD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIDDLEBY Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($982.1M vs $349.4M, roughly 2.8× Hayward Holdings, Inc.). Hayward Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.6% vs -52.2%, a 71.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hayward Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 4.2%). MIDDLEBY Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($156.1M vs $-35.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.2% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Bartlett-Hayward Company was an American metalworking company with large foundry, fabrication, and construction business lines, located in Baltimore, Maryland. Founded in the 1830s, it was independent until 1925 and since 1927 was owned by Koppers, of which it remained a division long afterward.
The Middleby Corporation is a publicly traded American company based in Elgin, Illinois. The company manufactures commercial cooking equipment, industrial processing equipment, and residential appliances. The commercial cooking equipment side of Middleby does business with 97 out of the top 100 food service chains in the United States and internationally.
HAYW vs MIDD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.4M | $982.1M |
| Net Profit | $68.4M | $-513.0M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | -56.4% |
| Net Margin | 19.6% | -52.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.8% | 4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.0% | -549.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-10.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $349.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.3M | $982.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $299.6M | $977.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.8M | $906.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.6M | $942.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.4M | $991.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.6M | $926.9M |
| Q4 25 | $68.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $-513.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.8M | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $92.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.7M | $112.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5M | $114.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.6M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.8M | $86.6M |
| Q4 25 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.2% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.7% | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.5% | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.7% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.0% | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.2% | 37.4% |
| Q4 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.8% | -56.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.5% | 14.8% |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-10.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $1.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $1.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $2.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $2.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $1.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $399.1M | $175.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $943.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $399.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.3M | $175.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $365.1M | $511.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $181.3M | $745.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.6M | $689.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.2M | $606.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.1M | $459.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.9M | $341.0M |
| Q4 25 | $943.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $947.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $949.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $950.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $950.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $959.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $959.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.67× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.82× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-26.9M | $176.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-35.8M | $156.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.3% | 15.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.39× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $227.3M | $591.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-26.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.6M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.8M | $141.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-63.7M | $239.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $156.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $287.0M | $149.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-77.2M | $140.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-35.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.2M | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $187.3M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-70.4M | $226.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.1M | $145.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.3M | $138.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-83.1M | $127.2M |
| Q4 25 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.1% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.34× | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.41× | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.16× | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.00× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.64× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.85× | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HAYW
Segment breakdown not available.
MIDD
| Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group | $433.7M | 44% |
| Other | $316.8M | 32% |
| Food Processing Group | $120.8M | 12% |
| Residential Kitchen | $110.8M | 11% |
