vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Elme Communities (ELME) and OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. (OLPX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.1M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.7× Elme Communities). OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -12.5% vs -198.9%, a 186.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.3% vs 1.7%). OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($32.6M vs $7.2M). Over the past eight quarters, OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is a specialty beauty company developing and selling patented bond-repair hair care products. It runs three core segments: professional salon distribution, direct-to-consumer sales, and third-party retail, serving customers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific with products that repair and protect damaged hair.
ELME vs OLPX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $105.1M |
| Net Profit | $-123.5M | $-13.1M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | -198.9% | -12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4058.7% | -48.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $105.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $114.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | $106.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $97.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.3M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | $103.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $98.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $465.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.1% | 69.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.2% | 69.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.9% | 66.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.5% | 68.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | 69.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.5% | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -183.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -198.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.40 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1M | $318.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $352.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $908.9M | $879.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $286.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $289.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $580.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $586.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $538.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $507.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $507.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $352.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $352.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $351.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $649.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $650.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $651.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $653.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $654.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $879.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.9M | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $874.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $874.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $879.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $863.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $855.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.76× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $32.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | $32.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.6% | 31.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.7M | $58.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $43.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $49.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $43.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | 43.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
OLPX
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $43.6M | 42% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Professional | $36.8M | 35% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Specialty Retail | $24.7M | 23% |