vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Elme Communities (ELME) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Elme Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.2× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -106.3% vs -198.9%, a 92.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Elme Communities posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Elme Communities's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
ELME vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-123.5M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -198.9% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4058.7% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.3M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $58.9M | $50.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-123.5M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-3.1M | $9.3M |
| Q3 25 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 65.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | -183.3% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 10.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -198.9% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | -5.3% | 18.3% |
| Q3 25 | $-1.40 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.04 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $908.9M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $873.4M |
| Q3 25 | $908.9M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $484.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.2B | $483.0M |
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $22.9M | $18.6M |
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 11.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 27.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
