vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ELECTRO SENSORS INC (ELSE) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ELECTRO SENSORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.0× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). ELECTRO SENSORS INC runs the higher net margin — 3.7% vs -697.1%, a 700.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Polar Electro Oy is a Finnish manufacturer of sports training computers, particularly known for developing the world's first wireless heart rate monitor.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
ELSE vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $103.0K | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | 50.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.7% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.8% | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $103.0K | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0K | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.0K | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.0K | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $201.0K | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.0K | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0K | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0K | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.9% | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.6M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.8M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $15.7M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.6M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.6M | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.8M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7M | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.5M | $734.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0K | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0K | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.0K | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0K | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.0K | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-277.0K | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.0K | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-158.0K | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.0K | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $389.0K | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-298.0K | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.0K | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-184.0K | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
