vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× Fabrinet). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 5.3%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
EMN vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $753.3M |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $2.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $858.6M |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $2.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $83.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $70.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
