vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× Eastman Chemical Company). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 5.3%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -8.6%).

Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.

EMN vs ROP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ROP
ROP
1.1× larger
ROP
$2.1B
$2.0B
EMN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ROP
ROP
+25.1% gap
ROP
11.3%
-13.8%
EMN
Higher net margin
ROP
ROP
10.5% more per $
ROP
15.8%
5.3%
EMN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ROP
ROP
Annualised
ROP
10.5%
-8.6%
EMN

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Revenue
$2.0B
$2.1B
Net Profit
$105.0M
$331.0M
Gross Margin
17.1%
69.4%
Operating Margin
27.2%
Net Margin
5.3%
15.8%
Revenue YoY
-13.8%
11.3%
Net Profit YoY
-42.3%
842.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.93
$4.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$2.0B
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$2.3B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$2.2B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$1.7B
Net Profit
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$105.0M
$331.0M
Q4 25
$105.0M
$428.4M
Q3 25
$47.0M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$140.0M
$378.3M
Q1 25
$182.0M
$331.1M
Q4 24
$330.0M
$462.3M
Q3 24
$180.0M
$367.9M
Q2 24
$230.0M
$337.1M
Gross Margin
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
17.1%
69.4%
Q4 25
17.1%
69.5%
Q3 25
19.7%
69.5%
Q2 25
22.1%
69.2%
Q1 25
24.8%
68.7%
Q4 24
24.7%
68.3%
Q3 24
24.6%
69.2%
Q2 24
25.3%
69.5%
Operating Margin
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
27.2%
Q4 25
0.6%
28.6%
Q3 25
6.1%
28.4%
Q2 25
7.4%
28.2%
Q1 25
11.0%
27.9%
Q4 24
13.2%
28.0%
Q3 24
11.4%
28.1%
Q2 24
12.1%
28.8%
Net Margin
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
5.3%
15.8%
Q4 25
5.3%
20.8%
Q3 25
2.1%
19.8%
Q2 25
6.1%
19.5%
Q1 25
7.9%
17.6%
Q4 24
14.7%
24.6%
Q3 24
7.3%
20.8%
Q2 24
9.7%
19.6%
EPS (diluted)
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$0.93
$4.87
Q4 25
$0.93
$3.97
Q3 25
$0.40
$3.68
Q2 25
$1.20
$3.49
Q1 25
$1.57
$3.06
Q4 24
$2.81
$4.29
Q3 24
$1.53
$3.40
Q2 24
$1.94
$3.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$566.0M
$382.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$6.0B
$18.8B
Total Assets
$14.9B
$34.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.52×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$566.0M
$382.9M
Q4 25
$566.0M
$297.4M
Q3 25
$320.0M
Q2 25
$242.4M
Q1 25
$372.8M
Q4 24
$837.0M
$188.2M
Q3 24
$269.6M
Q2 24
$251.5M
Total Debt
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$9.7B
Q4 25
$9.3B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$7.6B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$6.0B
$18.8B
Q4 25
$6.0B
$19.9B
Q3 25
$5.8B
$20.0B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$19.6B
Q1 25
$5.9B
$19.2B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$18.9B
Q3 24
$5.7B
$18.5B
Q2 24
$5.6B
$18.1B
Total Assets
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$14.9B
$34.6B
Q4 25
$14.9B
$34.6B
Q3 25
$15.0B
$34.6B
Q2 25
$15.2B
$33.2B
Q1 25
$15.0B
$31.4B
Q4 24
$15.2B
$31.3B
Q3 24
$15.1B
$31.6B
Q2 24
$14.9B
$29.8B
Debt / Equity
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
0.52×
Q4 25
0.47×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.40×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$507.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$502.0M
$738.0M
Q3 25
$402.0M
$869.5M
Q2 25
$233.0M
$404.1M
Q1 25
$-167.0M
$528.7M
Q4 24
$540.0M
$722.2M
Q3 24
$396.0M
$755.4M
Q2 24
$367.0M
$384.1M
Free Cash Flow
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$507.0M
Q4 25
$390.0M
Q3 25
$265.0M
Q2 25
$83.0M
Q1 25
$-314.0M
Q4 24
$361.0M
Q3 24
$276.0M
Q2 24
$252.0M
FCF Margin
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
24.2%
Q4 25
19.8%
Q3 25
12.0%
Q2 25
3.6%
Q1 25
-13.7%
Q4 24
16.1%
Q3 24
11.2%
Q2 24
10.7%
Capex Intensity
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
0.5%
Q4 25
5.7%
Q3 25
6.2%
Q2 25
6.6%
Q1 25
6.4%
Q4 24
8.0%
Q3 24
4.9%
Q2 24
4.9%
Cash Conversion
EMN
EMN
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.78×
1.72×
Q3 25
8.55×
2.18×
Q2 25
1.66×
1.07×
Q1 25
-0.92×
1.60×
Q4 24
1.64×
1.56×
Q3 24
2.20×
2.05×
Q2 24
1.60×
1.14×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons