vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.9× Eastman Chemical Company). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 1.4%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stanley Black & Decker posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Stanley Black & Decker's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
EMN vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
