vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enphase Energy (ENPH) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $282.9M, roughly 1.2× Enphase Energy). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -2.6%, a 9.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.3% vs -20.6%). Enphase Energy produced more free cash flow last quarter ($83.0M vs $28.6M). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Enphase Energy, Inc. is an American energy technology company headquartered in Fremont, California, that develops and manufactures solar micro-inverters, battery energy storage, and EV charging stations primarily for residential customers. Enphase was established in 2006 and is the first company to successfully commercialize solar micro-inverters, which convert the direct current (DC) power generated by solar panels into grid-compatible alternating current (AC) for use or export.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
ENPH vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $282.9M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 54.0% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.6% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -124.9% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $282.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $343.3M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $410.4M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.2M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.1M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $382.7M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $380.9M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.7M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.8M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.8% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.9% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.8% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | 54.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.29 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.5M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $497.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $995.0M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $880.6M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $810.7M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.0M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $931.4M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $884.5M | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.11× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.37× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.48× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.9M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.0M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.3% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.1M | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $102.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.6M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.3M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.1M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.1M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.8M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.4M | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.69× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.73× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENPH
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
