vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fabrinet is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $778.9M, roughly 1.5× ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -0.4%, a 10.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 6.5%). ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.2M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
ENR vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $753.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $731.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $80.9M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $858.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
