vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and G III APPAREL GROUP LTD (GIII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
G III APPAREL GROUP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($988.6M vs $778.9M, roughly 1.3× ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.). G III APPAREL GROUP LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 1.3%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.0% vs -9.0%). ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0B vs $-106.4M). Over the past eight quarters, G III APPAREL GROUP LTD's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 5.4%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
G III Apparel Group is a global fashion company that designs, sources, manufactures, markets and distributes apparel, footwear, and accessories under a range of owned and licensed well-known brands. It serves department stores, specialty retailers, and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe, and other key global markets, catering to casual, sportswear, and premium fashion consumer segments.
ENR vs GIII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $988.6M |
| Net Profit | $10.1M | $80.6M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.0% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.3% | -29.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $778.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $988.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $583.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $839.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $644.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $609.7M |
| Q1 26 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $80.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $48.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 40.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 42.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $172.5M | $184.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $6.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $173.2M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 19.13× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $172.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $184.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $257.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $181.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $104.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $414.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $508.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $213.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $402.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $402.7M |
| Q1 26 | $173.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | 19.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 0.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-97.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0B | $-106.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 260.1% | -10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.2B | $367.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $-97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $93.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $333.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $-111.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $-106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $64.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $323.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $32.8M |
| Q1 26 | 260.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | -11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 6.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 12.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 6.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | -0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
Segment breakdown not available.
GIII
| Proprietary Brands | $498.1M | 50% |
| Licensed Brands | $479.2M | 48% |
| Retail Segment | $45.7M | 5% |
