vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($778.9M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.4× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -0.4%, a 30.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
ENR vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $558.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $166.3M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 37.2% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | 23.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $500.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $119.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $19.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $294.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
