vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Public Storage (PSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Public Storage is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $778.9M, roughly 1.6× ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.). Public Storage runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs -0.4%, a 42.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
Public Storage, headquartered in Glendale, California, is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage. It is the largest brand of self-storage services in the US and owns approximately 9% of the self storage square footage in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, the company operated 3,073 self-storage facilities containing an aggregate of 221 million net rentable square feet of space.
ENR vs PSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $507.1M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 40.7% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 41.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | -17.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $507.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $511.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $358.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $614.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $430.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $518.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $508.9M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 44.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 44.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $318.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $9.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $20.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $318.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $296.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $287.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $447.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $599.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $542.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $271.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $9.1B |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $20.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $20.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $19.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $19.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $19.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $733.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $733.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $875.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $872.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $705.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $798.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $895.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $665.6M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
PSA
| Self Storage Operations | $1.1B | 93% |
| Ancillary Operations | $86.9M | 7% |
