vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. (REYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $778.9M, roughly 1.3× ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs -0.4%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 1.2%). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($200.0M vs $124.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.4% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
The Rival Company is an American manufacturer of small appliances that produces products under the Bionaire, Crock-Pot, Fasco, Patton, Pollenex, Rival, Simer, and White Mountain brands. It became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holmes Products Corp. in 1999, and later became a brand of Sunbeam Products, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation, which purchased Holmes in 2005. Jarden, in turn, merged with Newell Rubbermaid in 2016. It is now part of the Newell Brands company.
ENR vs REYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $118.0M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | -1.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $931.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $938.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $818.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $910.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $930.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $833.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $97.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $147.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $101.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $135.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | 0.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $237.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | $200.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | $316.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $237.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $124.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $84.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $99.0M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $70.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
REYN
| Reynolds Cooking And Baking | $397.0M | 38% |
| Hefty Waste And Storage | $247.0M | 24% |
| Tableware Products | $229.0M | 22% |
| Presto Products | $164.0M | 16% |
